The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has published its World Economic Outlook for January 2018 and has subsequently revised its original forecast for global growth in 2018 and 2019 - up by 0.2 to 3.9% for both years.
The development in global gro
The index is now on wave 4 of a wave C corrective move and starting to show signs of basing.
The March futures have completed their wave 4 correction and have now started a wave 5 bull move. The stochastic is low compared to price, if a new high is not replicated by the stochastic it would create a bearish divergence. A warning of slowing momentum, not a sell signal.
Elliott wave analysis would suggest that the Q2 futures are now on wave 5 of wave 3. We are now seeing a bullish divergence as the market makes new highs.
Cal 19 remains bullish above the 8 period EMA but is showing a bearish divergence.
Above the 50 period MA market pullbacks should be regarded as corrective rather than bearish.
Supramax Index Daily
Resistance – 10,475, 10,592
Support – 9,339, 9,229, 9,081
Technical support has held at USD 9,339 on the Supramax index. The stochastic remains in oversold territory at 6 on the daily chart, with the weekly stochastic also in oversold territory at 3.
The index is now showing signs of starting to base, with Fibonacci resistance at USD 9,779, USD 9,912 and USD 10,045. Upside moves that fail below or in the resistance zone would suggest that the index is entering its 5th and final wave down.
Upside moves that make new highs above USD 10,475 would have bullish implications going forward. Likewise, a close below USD 9,350 would create a new low and should be considered bearish. However, this would signal a wave 5 down, which is often the last wave before a longer-term corrective or bullish move.
Supramax March 18 Daily
Resistance – 11,195, 11,370, 11,507, 11,742
Support – 10,453, 10,170, 9,985, 9,655
Last week we highlighted the that the March futures were in a leg 4 corrective phase with technical support at USD 10,453. Support has held, and the futures have so far rallied USD 500 to USD 11,090.
Technically the trend remains bullish based on the Elliott wave analysis with the 8 period EMA looking to cross the 21 period EMA soon. Technical resistance is between USD 11,370 to USD 11,742. If the futures make new highs and the stochastic does not, this is known as a bearish divergence. Not a sell signal, it is a warning that upside momentum could be weakening.
If price action starts to reverse in the resistance zone with a divergence in play, then there is a higher probability that we have seen a wave 5 completion and are likely to enter another corrective phase.
Supramax Q2 18 Daily
Resistance – 12,007, 12,206, 12,404
Support – 11,367, 11,047, 10,650
The leg 4 corrective wave was short last week, with downside moves failing to test the technical support at USD 11,047.
The Q2 18 futures are now trading at new highs and a bearish divergence has formed with the stochastic only at 35. This is a warning that momentum is slowing down and should not be regarded as a sell signal.
Technical resistance is between USD 12,007 and USD 12,404. Upside moves that fail in the resistance zone with a divergence in play would suggest that we are entering another corrective phase.
Technically the trend is bullish. From an Elliott wave perspective this looks to be leg 5 of a leg 3 wave, and not a leg 5 high, indicating a correction rather than a market top
Supramax Cal 19 Daily
Resistance – 11,106, 11,241, 11,377
Support – 10,830, 10,444, 10,294,
The 8 period EMA continues to hold firm on the Cal 19 futures keeping the futures in bullish territory.
The stochastic is now diverging with price implying bullish momentum could slow down. This is a warning not a sell signal. Upside moves that fail in the technical resistance zone with a bearish divergence in play would suggest we should be entering a corrective phase.
Downside moves that trade below the USD 10,830 support would indicate that the Cal 19 futures have entered a corrective phase. However, the 50 period MA has acted as a strong support in the market and above this average the market can only be regarded as corrective and not be considered bearish.
Source: Freight Investor Services (FIS)
wth is driven by a higher growth from advanced economies than first anticipated. The IMF now expects the GDP for advanced economies to grow by 2.3% in 2018 and 2.2% in 2019, which is an upward revision of 0.3 percentage points for 2018 and 0.4 for 2019. This is the highest upward cumulative revision for advanced economies since January 2010, when we saw a false dawn for an improvement in the global economy. If this growth materialises, it will be highly beneficial for the container shipping industry, as growth in advanced economies generates the highest trade-to-GDP multiplier.
Amid strong growth in the Euro area and the US, the IMF has maintained its projection for the emerging markets and developing countries (EMDEs) of 4.9% growth in 2018 and 5% in 2019. The IMF expects the global economy to maintain its momentum in the short term, unless a significant correction in the financial markets derails it.
When navigating such a strong global economy, it is essential that countries reap the opportunities this “window” provides and undertake critical reforms. With global long-term growth projected to rise only moderately in the coming years, it is essential that nations implement structural reforms to unleash any additional growth potential. Improving the economic growth potential through structural reforms supports productivity, and thereby improves the medium and long- term derived demand for the shipping industry.
Manufacturing in Europe is currently running at full throttle according to the Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI). In our previous analysis of global macroeconomics, we focused on strengthening manufacturing PMIs with the growth from the Euro area. This growth has continued and reached the highest level ever recorded in December 2017. While the Manufacturing PMI for January 2018 has dropped slightly from the record high, it remains well above the threshold level at 50. Therefore, the Euro area has signalled expansion in every consecutive month over the past 55 months.
Despite a high manufacturing PMI for the Euro area, core inflationary pressure remains low and together with subdued wage growth, there is indication of a further opportunity to squeeze the labour market. However, IHS Markit (The PMI data provider) has emphasised that both input costs and output prices are currently rising at faster rates. The input costs have increased because of shortages due to demand outstripping supply. This provides a rising demand for container shipping, as the shortage mainly comes from partly finished goods (and equipment used for production of consumer goods).
In line with a surge in manufacturing, the IMF has increased its expectations for the Euro area output by 0.3 for 2018 and 2019, which amounts to a growth rate of 2.2% in 2018 and 2% in 2019. This is primarily due to a stronger momentum in both domestic and foreign demand.
It is evident that the IMF expects the US tax bill to generate plenty of activity after hiking the growth for the US by 0.4 percentage points for 2018 to 2.7%, and by 0.6 for 2019 to 2.5%. They estimate that half of the upward revision for the global growth projection for 2018 and 2019 will be driven by US output and the positive effect it may have on its trading partners. For shipping, a possible boost in investment will lead to higher demand and increased trade, if it is not absorbed by inward looking policy requirements.
For the container shipping industry, the economic picture in the US is favourable with a possible pick up in wages boosting consumer demand. In January 2018, the US achieved the highest increase in average hourly earnings since June 2009, together with a 17-year low unemployment level, elevating consumer and business confidence.
Unsurprisingly China reported a GDP growth of 6.8% for the full year in 2017, as this has been the new normal growth rate for the Chinese economy. Despite not growing by a two-digit figure, it must be emphasised that this is still a significant growth rate and, in absolute terms, adds more to the Chinese economy than previous growth levels such as 14.2% in 2007.
While the pace of economic expansion in China slows down, it is important still to remember that China grew its GDP by USD 705bn in 2017. This is equal to the entire Swiss economy, measured at USD 680bn in 2017, or two times the size of the entire South African economy (USD 344bn) (source: IMF).
The growth rate in the Chinese economy for 2018 is expected to slow moderately with the focus shifting towards relative financial tightening after years of aggressive expansionary fiscal and monetary policies. This is dampening investments in construction and infrastructure, which in turn leads to lower demand growth for dry bulk commodities imported by China.
The IMF has revised its expectations for Chinese GDP - up by 0.1 for both 2018 and 2019. The expected growth is now 6.6% in 2018 and 6.4% in 2019. This increase is mainly due to stronger external demand.
In December 2017 Japan achieved the highest recorded seasonally adjusted industrial production level since October 2008. This corresponds to the significant increase in the IMF’s projection for Japan’s GDP as expectations have been lifted by 0.5 to 1.2% GDP growth for 2018, and by 0.1 to 0.9% GDP growth for 2019.
It has been quite some time since macro-economic development has looked this positive and as supportive of shipping.
Political events can undermine the development, but 2018 appears to bring fewer economic growth “derailing” events compared to 2017. The most important factors to potentially derail growth are likely to be the US midterm elections in November, the renegotiation of the NAFTA and the negotiation of the Brexit deal. Notwithstanding, the sustainability of the all-important Chinese economy.
For sustained economic growth, the political deals resulting from these events need to decrease the number of trade barriers and ensure regulatory alignment. This will help to encourage potential growth as restrictive trade measures can discourage trade flows and have negative knock-on effects on economic growth and job creation.
The World Trade Organization (WTO) has asked all nations to resist from adopting inward-looking policies and urged its members to show leadership by committing to open and mutually beneficial trade. According to the most recent trade monitoring report this has been embraced. In the period from mid-October 2016 to mid-October 2017, 128 measures were implemented to facilitate trade, compared to 108 trade-restrictive ones.
According to the WTO, world merchandise trade has rebounded strongly as volumes grew by 3.6% in 2017 compared to 1.3% in 2016. It is expected that this will drop moderately to 3.2% in 2018 due to a downside risk arising from trade policy measures and geopolitical tensions.
Source: Peter Sand / BIMCOPrevious Next
We Have Increased & Enhanced Our Global Presence: Mr. Suresh Sinha, MD, IRClass
India Tanker Shipping Trade Summit 2018