14-06-2016

China’s ship-breaking industry swimming through troubled waters

shipbreaking

China’s ship-breaking industry is feeling hemmed in by low steel prices, scrap oversupply and green production methods
In 2014, the ship recycling industry was grey; it turned black in 2015; but, this year, it will go blood red.

That’s not a dramatic line from a Hollywood take on some imminent industrial tragedy. It’s the writing on the wall that workers of Zhoushan’s ship-breaking yards in East China’s Zhejiang province cannot escape but notice.

The room for profit will continue to be squeezed this year by declining steel prices and the high cost of environment-friendly ship-breaking methods. Yet, pain will come despite favorable policies of the past three years to encourage higher ship-breaking in response to overcapacity and sluggish global trade.

The ship-breaking industry supplies raw materials to infrastructure projects in a number of sectors such as hydropower, housing, bridge and railway construction, particularly in developing countries. The process starts when scrap-yard owners buy ships from owners.

To help China’s shipping companies reduce the pressure caused by overcapacity over the past four years, the central government issued a subsidy policy to encourage the nation’s shipping companies to reduce the number of aging vessels and replace them with technically advanced vessels in 2013.

Owing to complex global market conditions that continued to pose challenges to domestic shipping, shipbuilding and ship-breaking companies, this policy had been extended in June last year till Dec 31, 2017.

China, therefore, will keep offering cash subsidies of 1,500 yuan per gross metric ton to shipping companies that scrap their vessels before their operational expiry dates.

Ship owners such as China COSCO Shipping Co or Sinotrans & CSC Holdings Co are entitled to receive 50 percent of the cash subsidies upon scrapping their vessels and the other 50 percent when a new replacement vessel is built. The owners of all aging ships scrapped between 2013 and 2017 qualify for subsidies.

Zhang Yongfeng, deputy director of the market research office of the Shanghai International Shipping Institute, said Chinese ship-breaking yards have been adopting new technologies to carry out their work, which involves higher costs for equipment, materials, storage and workers’ protective wear.

Compared with China, other major ship-breaking countries such as Turkey, India and Bangladesh are still relying on manual methods and outdated equipment to dismantle ships. Many scrap vessels are even dismantled on beaches.

Zhang suggested the government should consider offering more encouraging policies, such as tax cuts or financial help to those buying steel-cutting equipment or materials, as many ship-recycling companies bear heavy financial burdens in operating their businesses in an environment-friendly manner.

“It was like riding a roller-coaster,” said Yang Jianchen, general manager of Zhoushan Hongying Shipbreaking Co. “The period between 2006 and 2013 was good for the industry. The decline in global steel prices including scrap has pushed many ship-breakers in Zhejiang into the red.”

Yang said since China’s steel products are being shipped to many developing countries such as India, Brazil, South Africa and Turkey at lower prices now compared with previous years, it has pulled down the price of their domestically made steel products. It has also affected scrap prices at the yards.

A typical scrap yard used to employ 230 workers in 2013. Now, their number has plummeted to around 170 due to cost-cuts, delayed payments and attrition.
Yang said even though the government offered subsidies to ship-breaking companies to buy vessels, it is extremely hard to make any profit. And banks are not willing to lend because they are aware how sluggish the business is.

“Just like shipbuilding, ship-breaking is listed as a high-risk industry by banks.”

The latest figures show China’s ship-breaking industry’s revenue dropped 15 percent to 3.4 billion yuan ($519 million) last year.

Wu Jun, vice-president of the Beijing-based China National Ship Recycling Association, said because China is taking action to scale down infrastructure and real estate investment while using restrictive measures to cut production capacity in its steel plants, the country currently does not need a large amount of scrap as a source of steel at the moment.

“Under such circumstances, it will be cumbersome for Chinese ship-breaking yards to sell scrap even at a bargain price to the market this year,” Wu said. “Last year was the fourth consecutive year that the industry has suffered financial losses.”

The association’s findings showed as the world’s largest recycler of material from ship-breaking yards, China dismantled 5.1 million dead weight tons in 2015, accounting for 22.14 percent of the world’s total. India, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Turkey were its main rivals in this business.

Chinese companies signed contracts with both domestic and foreign shipowners to dismantle 6.84 million DWT of scrap vessels in 2015, down 28.7 percent from the previous year.

“The relatively high prices of both foreign and domestic scrap ships are also cutting the profit margins of Chinese companies as many have been reporting financial losses for the past several years,” said Zhao Ying, a researcher at the Institute of Industrial Economics under the management of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing.

China’s ship-recycling yards are mainly located in Zhejiang, Jiangsu, Shandong and Guangdong provinces, collectively employing around 120,000 workers. Their jobs are now under threat.

The drop in scrap prices has seen firms storing supplies in increasing amounts, rather than offloading it cheaply to steel plants, said Zhao.

Affected by low commodity and crude oil prices, the China National Ship Recycling Association said the number of bulk vessel and offshore oil rigs actually being dismantled has grown more than 30 percent in the past year, adding to the oversupply of underpriced scrap.

Copenhagen-based Baltic and International Maritime Council, the world’s largest international shipping association, predicted that 2016 would be the busiest year for breaking of dry ships. Around 40 million DWT of bulk ships will be dismantled, up 25 percent year-on-year.

Source: China Daily

Previous Next
 

We Are Creating More Value for EXIM Trade : Mr. Neeraj Bansal

View More Videos


Gallery

India Dry Bulk Cargo Summit 2017

View All Albums